[support for a proscribed organization; Actus reus of offence; Meaning of ‘invites support’; Terrorism Act 2000, s 12(1)(a)]
R v Kahar; R v Ziamani [2016] EWCA Crim 568, [2017] 2 All ER 782
[Guidance on the sentencing of offenders convicted of engaging in conduct in preparation of acts of terrorism, contrary to section 5 of the Terrorism Act […]
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 1930 (Admin); [2017] 4 WLR 154
[Prevent Duty Guidance explaining how universities and other further educational institutions should give effect to their duty under section 26(1) of the Counter-Terrorism and Security […]
Regina (Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another (Liberty and others intervening) [2016] 1 WLR 1505
[powers under Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 20001 to stop, question and detain; neither the geographical or temporal constraints on the exercise of the […]
Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions [2014] QB 607
[powers of examination in Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000; articles 5, 6 and 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; […]
Regina v Gul (Mohammed) [2014] A.C. 1260
[meaning of terrorism; the extra-territorial meaning of terrorism; dissemination of terrorist publication]
Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700
[impose financial restrictions under section 62 of and Schedule 7 to the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008, made the Financial Restrictions (Iran) Order 2009 which contained a […]
Regina v Faraz [2013] 1 WLR 2615
[whether readership of the publication could be admissible in proof of a direct or indirect encouragement of terrorism; dissemination of terrorist publication]
Al-Sirri (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; DD (Afghanistan) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 54, [2013] 1 AC 745,
[Article 1F(c) of the Convention and Protocol relating to the Status of Refugeeswas only triggered in extreme circumstances by activity which attacked the basis of […]
R v Muhammed [2010] 3 All ER 759
[Collecting or making record of information of kind likely to be useful to person committing or preparing act of terrorism or possessing document or record […]
Siddique v HM Advocate [2010] HCJAC 7, 2010 JC 110
[the lack of clear directions to the effect that sec 57 of the Terrorism Act 2000 was to be interpreted in a way that had required a […]
Secretary of State for the Home Department v E and another [2008] 1 AC 499
[non-derogating control order against claimant under section 2(1) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005; the proper approach in assessing whether the measures in question […]
R v Rahman; R v Mohammed [2008] 4 All ER 661 [Tab 6]
[dissemination of terrorist publication; what to consider in passing sentence]
Regina v Rowe [2007] QB 975
[Terrorism Act 20000 ss 57 and 58; Possessing article for terrorist purposes; in possession of notebook containing mortar instructions and substitution code listing components of […]
Regina v F [2007] QB 960
[section 58 of the Terrorism Act 20001; in possession of a document or record containing information of a kind likely to be useful to a […]
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department; X v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56; [2005] 2 AC 68
[constitutionality of s 23 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 to detain non-nationals if the Home Secretary believed that their presence in the […]
Ahmed and others v Her Majesty’s Treasury (Nos 1 and 2); Al-Ghabra v Same (Same intervening); Regina (Youssef) v Same (Same intervening) [2010] 2 AC 534
[Since fundamental rights could only be overridden by express language or necessary implication, the general wording of section 1 of the United Nation Act 1946 […]
R v G; R v J [2009] UKHL 13; [2010] 1 AC 43
[section 58(1) of the Terrorism Act 2000 did not criminalize the possession of information of a kind regularly obtained or used for everyday purposes simply […]
R v Zafar [2008] EWCA Crim 184, [2008] QB 810
[Possessing article for terrorist purposes; Defendants accused of possessing extremist literature in order to incite each other to commit act of terrorism; Whether possessed “for […]
Regina (Gillan and another) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and another [2006] 2 AC 307
“expedient” in section 44(3) of the Terrorism Act 2000 was not synonymous with “necessary”; that authorisations under section 44 and the exercise of the power […]