[incitement to violence as a prerequisite requirement under common law]
Wallace-Johnson Appellant; And the King Respondent. On Appeal from the West African Court of Appeal [1940] AC 231
[incitement to violence not necessary under a codified law on sedition without an explicit mentioning of which]
R v Aldred (1909) 74 JP 55, 22 Cox CC 1
[Accused may not plead the truth of the statements that he makes as a defence to the charges nor may he plead the innocence of […]
R v Burns (1886) 16 Cox CC 355
[An intention to excite ill-will between different classes of Her Majesty’s subjects may be a seditious intention; sedition embraces everything, whether by word, deed, or […]
R v Fussell (1848) 12 JP 537, 6 State Tr NS 723, 3 Cox CC 291
[Expressions intended and tending under the circumstances of the time to produce hatred and contempt of the institutions of the country and to induce unlawful […]
R v Lovett (1839) 9 C & P 462, 3 State Tr NS 1177, 173 ER 912
[If a paper, published by the defendant, has a direct tendency to cause unlawful meetings and disturbances, and to lead, to a violation of the […]
R v Collins (1839) 9 C & P 456, 3 State Tr NS 1149, 173 ER 910
[Every man has a right to give every public matter a candid, full, and free discussion ; but although the people have a right to […]
Rex v Lambert and Perry (1810) 2 Camp. 398; 170 ER 1196
[It is not libellous for a writer who allows the Sovereign to be solicitous for the welfare of his subjects, and who has no intention […]
The Case of the Seven Bishops (1688) 87 ER 136
[haebaus corpus proceeding]
R v Lane and another [2019] 1 All ER 299
[Criminal law — Terrorism — Terrorist offences — Funding arrangements — Meaning of ‘has reasonable cause to suspect’ — Terrorism Act 2000, s 17]
Regina v Ali (Humza) [2018] 1 WLR 6105
[dissemination of terrorist publication; how s 2 of the Terrorism Act 2006 was understood so that it does not infringe people’s right to free speech; […]
Regina v Alamgir and others [2018] 4 WLR 40
[encouraging support for a proscribed organisation under section 12 of the Terrorism Act 2000; sentencing]
R v Choudary and another [2017] 3 All ER 459
[support for a proscribed organization; Actus reus of offence; Meaning of ‘invites support’; Terrorism Act 2000, s 12(1)(a)]
R v Kahar; R v Ziamani [2016] EWCA Crim 568, [2017] 2 All ER 782
[Guidance on the sentencing of offenders convicted of engaging in conduct in preparation of acts of terrorism, contrary to section 5 of the Terrorism Act […]
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 1930 (Admin); [2017] 4 WLR 154
[Prevent Duty Guidance explaining how universities and other further educational institutions should give effect to their duty under section 26(1) of the Counter-Terrorism and Security […]
Regina (Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another (Liberty and others intervening) [2016] 1 WLR 1505
[powers under Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 20001 to stop, question and detain; neither the geographical or temporal constraints on the exercise of the […]
Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions [2014] QB 607
[powers of examination in Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000; articles 5, 6 and 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; […]
Regina v Gul (Mohammed) [2014] A.C. 1260
[meaning of terrorism; the extra-territorial meaning of terrorism; dissemination of terrorist publication]
Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700
[impose financial restrictions under section 62 of and Schedule 7 to the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008, made the Financial Restrictions (Iran) Order 2009 which contained a […]