[whether readership of the publication could be admissible in proof of a direct or indirect encouragement of terrorism; dissemination of terrorist publication]
Al-Sirri (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; DD (Afghanistan) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 54, [2013] 1 AC 745,
[Article 1F(c) of the Convention and Protocol relating to the Status of Refugeeswas only triggered in extreme circumstances by activity which attacked the basis of […]
R v Muhammed [2010] 3 All ER 759
[Collecting or making record of information of kind likely to be useful to person committing or preparing act of terrorism or possessing document or record […]
Siddique v HM Advocate [2010] HCJAC 7, 2010 JC 110
[the lack of clear directions to the effect that sec 57 of the Terrorism Act 2000 was to be interpreted in a way that had required a […]
Secretary of State for the Home Department v E and another [2008] 1 AC 499
[non-derogating control order against claimant under section 2(1) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005; the proper approach in assessing whether the measures in question […]
R v Rahman; R v Mohammed [2008] 4 All ER 661 [Tab 6]
[dissemination of terrorist publication; what to consider in passing sentence]
Regina v Rowe [2007] QB 975
[Terrorism Act 20000 ss 57 and 58; Possessing article for terrorist purposes; in possession of notebook containing mortar instructions and substitution code listing components of […]
Regina v F [2007] QB 960
[section 58 of the Terrorism Act 20001; in possession of a document or record containing information of a kind likely to be useful to a […]
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department; X v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56; [2005] 2 AC 68
[constitutionality of s 23 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 to detain non-nationals if the Home Secretary believed that their presence in the […]
Ahmed and others v Her Majesty’s Treasury (Nos 1 and 2); Al-Ghabra v Same (Same intervening); Regina (Youssef) v Same (Same intervening) [2010] 2 AC 534
[Since fundamental rights could only be overridden by express language or necessary implication, the general wording of section 1 of the United Nation Act 1946 […]
R v G; R v J [2009] UKHL 13; [2010] 1 AC 43
[section 58(1) of the Terrorism Act 2000 did not criminalize the possession of information of a kind regularly obtained or used for everyday purposes simply […]
R v Zafar [2008] EWCA Crim 184, [2008] QB 810
[Possessing article for terrorist purposes; Defendants accused of possessing extremist literature in order to incite each other to commit act of terrorism; Whether possessed “for […]
Regina (Gillan and another) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and another [2006] 2 AC 307
“expedient” in section 44(3) of the Terrorism Act 2000 was not synonymous with “necessary”; that authorisations under section 44 and the exercise of the power […]
Regina v Z (Attorney General for Northern Ireland’s Reference) [2005] 2 AC 645
[Belonging to proscribed organization; Listed organization; Dissident members of terrorist group forming separate body; Main group but not separate body named by statute as proscribed […]
Sheldrake v Director of Public Prosecutions Attorney General’s Reference (No 4 of 2002) [2005] 1 AC 264
[Terrorism Act s 11(1); member of the proscribed organization; s 11(2) defence; evidential burden on the defendant; presumption of innocence]
R (on the application of Gillan) v Metropolitan Police Comr; R (on the application of Quinton) v Metropolitan Police Comr [2005] QB 388
[interpretation of the 2000 Act was a matter of law and there was no question of the court showing deference to the views of the […]
Sykes v Director of Public Prosecutions [1961] 3 All ER 33
[Whether Misprision of felony exists; Whether active concealment essential ingredient of offence]
Joyce v DPP [1946] AC 347; [1946] 1 All ER 186
[an alien abroad holding a British passport enjoys the protection of the Crown and if he is adherent to the King’s enemies he is guilty […]
R v Casement [1917] 1 KB 98
[if a British subject be adherent to the King’s enemies in his realm by giving to them aid or comfort in his realm, or if […]