You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Public Prosecutor v Yue Mun Yew Gary [2013] 1 SLR 39; [2012] SGHC 188
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Mohd Sani and Mohd Azizuddin, “Balancing Freedom of Speech and National Security in Malaysia”, Vol. 5(4), Asian Politics & Policy (2013)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Tyler James Brent Jeffery, “Preventive Detention in Malaysia: Constitutional and Judicial Obstacles to Reform and Suggestions for the Future”, Vol. 41, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law (2013)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Cathleen Hamel Hartge, “China’s National Security Review: Motivations and the Implications for Investors”, Vol 49(1), Stanford Journal of International Law (2013)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
劉仁文《中國反恐刑事立法的描述與評析》，《法學家》(2013)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
葛勇平：《法學視野下一個中國原則的完整內涵和要求》《學習與探索》第7期 （2013）
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
梁馨月：《國家機密保護法制之研究—以總統刑事豁免權與國家機密特權為中心》，南台科技大學財經法律研究所碩士論文（2013）
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
曾華嘉：《論內亂行為之除罪化─以危懼共感之存否為核心》，中國文化大學法律學系碩士論文（2013）
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Supreme Court Decision 2013Do2511 (26 July 2013)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Youth Initiative for Human Rights v Servia, Application no. 48135/06 (25 June 2013)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Heidi Kitrosser, “Free Speech aboard the Leaky Ship of State: Calibrating First Amendment Protections for Leakers of Classified Information” 6(2) Journal of National Security Law and Policy (2013)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
David Pozen, “The Leaky Leviathan: Why the Government Condemns and Condones Unlawful Disclosures of Information” 127 Harvard Law Review (2013) 512-635
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Supreme Court Decision 2010Do3504 (15 February 2013) [Case Summary]
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Natasa Mavronicola and Francesco Messineo, “Relatively Absolute? The Undermining of Article 3 ECHR in Ahmad v UK” 3 Modern law review (2013)[full text]
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Helen Fenwick, “Designing ETPIMS around ECHR Review or Normalisation of ‘Preventive’ Non-Trial-Based Executive Measures?” 5 Modern law review (2013)[full text]
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
ECtHR, “National Security and European Case-Law”(2013)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
“National Security, Human Rights and the Federal Court – speech delivered by the Honourable Anne Mactavish before the International Commission of Jurists in Ottawa” (4 Feb 2013)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Carmen Cheung, “Oversight and Accountability of Canada’s National Security Agencies: A Framework for Discussion” 92(1) Canadian Bar Review (2013)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Yavar Hameed, “Unmasking the Public Interest in Discretionary National Security Decisions in Canada” 92(1) Canadian Bar Review (2013)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal