You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Sin Liang, Tan, “The threat of terrorism and Singapore’s legislative response to terrorism financing”, Vol 7(2), Journal of Money Laundering Control, (2004)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Mohammad Ezam Mohd Nor v Public Prosecutor [2004] MLJU 756 (High Court, Shah Alam)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
“Report From the Field: The USA Patriot Act At Work” (US Department of Justice Publication 2004)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Rasul v. Bush 542 U.S. 466 (2004)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
中國人大：《什麼是背叛國家罪？》中國人大網（2004年4 月19日）
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Amnesty International, “Open letter to Acting President Goh Kun – Continued use of the draconian National Security Law: Amnesty International’s concerns about Professor Song Du-yul’s case”, Amnesty International, Index ASA 25/003/2004, (2 April 2004)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
John Hedigan, “The European Convention on Human Rights and Counter-Terrorism” 28(2) Fordham International Law Journal (2004)[full text]
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Colin Warbrick, “The European Response to Terrorism in an Age of Human Rights” 15(5) The European Journal of International Law (2004)[full text]
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Vancouver Sun (Re) [2004] 2 SCR 332
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Craig Forcese, “Clouding Accountability: Canada’s Government Secrecy and National Security Law ‘Complex’” 36(1) Ottawa law review (2004)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Perilous Times: Free Speech in Wartime: From the Sedition Act of 1798 to the War on Terrorism
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Alison Elizabeth Chase, “Legal Mechanisms of the International Community and the United States concerning State Sponsorship of Terrorism” 45 (1) Virginia Journal of International Law (2004)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Viet D. Dinh, “How the USA Patriot Act Defends Democracy” 2(2) Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy (2004)[full text]
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Timothy Scahill, “The Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003: A Glimpse Into a Post-Patriot Act Approach to Combating Domestic Terrorism” 38 John Marshall Law Review (2004)[full text]
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
The USA Patriot Act of 2001: Balancing Civil Liberties and National Security: A Reference Handbook
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Albert Chen, “How Hong Kong Law Will Change When Article 23 of the Basic Law is Implemented” Vol 33(1) Hong Kong Law Journal (2003)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
Ramdas Tikamadas, “National Security and Constitutional Rights: The Internal Security Act 1960”, Vol 32(1), The Journal of the Malaysian Bar (2003)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal
John D. Ciorciari, “A Half-Way Challenge to Malaysia’s Internal Security Act (Mohamad Ezam Bin Mohd Nor v Ketua Polis Negara)”, Vol 3(2), Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal (2003)
You don’t have permission to view the content, please login via HKU Portal